Skip to content
Home > ‘Michael’ (2026): A Review

‘Michael’ (2026): A Review

A Not-so-Epic Long-Awaited Biopic

Michael is a biopic that tells the story of Michael Jackson’s life and his rise to stardom. The film begins at the inception of the Jackson 5, riding the wave of success into a solo career as a household name in the ’80s. With so much success in viewing Michael’s artistry, his creative drive remained his greatest vice. 

The Road to Stardom

Michael details the humble beginnings of the Jackson family in Gary, Indiana. The family is led by Joseph Jackson, who assembles what will be known as The Jackson 5 with Michael as the lead vocalist. The discipline that Joseph instills in the group leads them to be signed by the world-renowned label Motown. This brings the world of the Jackson family to greater heights, with Michael perceived as an even greater talent beyond the familial ensemble. With so much promise, Michael steps out on faith as a solo artist, becoming the artist known today as the “king of pop.” 

As far as a biopic goes, Michael is as hollow as an urn without ashes when it comes to detailing his personal story. There aren’t many personal moments, and the ones we do get aren’t layered and detail things that are already known. There were so many moments to add integral details to his lived experience, and the film really played it beyond safe. Aside from this huge misstep, the film is rushed, and there are so many moments and scenes that were cut, which shows immensely. For example, the way the Jacksons were signed to Motown was hardly even showcased, and Michael and his brothers were huge players in the success of Motown. The Jacksons’ move from Gary, Indiana, to Encino was a horrible transition, which was another pivotal moment for the Jackson family. The best moments of the film (for the most part) are the music numbers. This is where fans and audiences will more than likely connect and, if at all, be pleased, because there was so much emphasis placed on these scenes that if they weren’t done justice, the cost would be too high. 

The pacing of this film was back-and-forth and tremulous because there was way too much ground to cover. The film should have easily been split into three parts and worked as a trilogy. The Jackson 5 in itself is a film on its own, and then leading into the early stages of his solo career would have worked perfectly. For the conclusion of the trilogy, where this film ends, is actually how they could begin the conclusion of a trilogy, and it would be better for audiences because the Bad tour of 1988 was such an important moment. Michael was at his peak. The choices made for Michael were too controlled for a biopic, and it never leaned into a personal background from a nuanced lens.

Performance of Reality

Any director tasked with directing a Michael Jackson biopic was and will always be held to a standard that could be deemed as unattainable. In Antoine Fuqua’s case, there is so much that can be surmised. It’s fair to say that he wanted to be respectful to the Jackson family and follow the estate’s rules. While this is admirable, it dilutes the film’s significance by failing to lean into the not-so-high-and-mild moments. That is ultimately where this film suffers because nothing goes beyond the surface, leaving nothing but cinematic music numbers to be desired. It could even be said that the halt of the production in its final stages of filming caused the creative direction to dissipate from what was originally expected. In those cases, the film should not have been touched until all paths aligned and were vetted. This film personifies that result. What Fuqua does well is capture the sheer essence of the musical numbers; this is the one thing that can easily be celebrated. The story’s rush and pacing ruined the film’s moments and anticipation, aside from the lack of layered personal storytelling. As this film ends as only half of Michael’s story, there is lots of room for Fuqua to improve and make a better half if there is another installment on the horizon. 

The supporting cast is massively flawed, though most are well-acted. Larenz Tate’s portrayal of Barry Gordy, as showcased, was well depicted and one of the few personal scenes that made an impact on Michael as a young artist. Aside from that, his role was cut from that point on, which is a disservice to the Motown era that Jackson gained notoriety from, given the weight the name Motown holds. Another portrayal that was noted, only cut short but questionable due to the timeline, was Laura Harrier’s portrayal as Susanne de Paase.

The significant disservice of cutting Harrier’s part in the film is that she was not only responsible for going to bat and getting Jackson signed to Motown, but she was also Michael’s mentor and close long-time confidant. The lack of story for Michael’s closest and most influential figures was sidelined, leaving a huge void in the film’s Motown-era storytelling. Miles Teller as Michael’s Lawyer, John Branca, was well done and overutilized. There wasn’t much need beyond muzzling Michael’s father for Branca to have as much screentime given when other pivotal characters could’ve added more. 

Nia Long’s embodiment of Katherine Jackson was well executed, but paper-thin in storytelling. The film had the chance to lean into how complicit she was in adding to and abetting the abuse that her husband inflicted on the boys to make them famous. Aside from these tonal plot points, her moments with Michael were warm and offered him a safe space to give context as to how he shows up in the world through the lens of those in his inner circle. The film did not shy away from disdain for how Joe treated his family and made a point of using that as a driving force behind why Michael had to make strategic moves in their contentious relations. Coleman Domingo as Joe Jackson was given so much, and what was given was a stern and abusive portrayal that was rightfully displayed. The flaws with the role are that the writing wasn’t on par with what Domingo is used to. Due to this, his portrayal came off cartoonish at times with minor levels of sincerity. 

As for the portrayal of Michael Jackson, both Jafar Jackson and Julianno Valdi were the best choices, as they could only do the roles justice. It is apparent that both Jackson and Valdi were tasked with high-stakes work, and they took it to heart, paying close attention to every step in Michael’s choreography and not missing a beat. Especially Jafar Jackson, being the nephew of Michael, he knew what that meant for his legacy, and aside from the physicalities, he embodied the demure essence and vocal ability that only his uncle could possess. 

Star Presence

It goes without saying that the music behind the genius hat is Michael Jackson, which is why the audience will be attending this biopic. For that aspect alone, the fans who are coming for that only will be immensely pleased. The expense on the musical numbers is not spared; their music, from a theatrical standpoint, feels like an actual  Michael Jackson concert. This is a great direction from Fuqua’s perspective because one issue could easily throw off the weight that these moments hold. The “Beat It” sequence and the “Human Nature” numbers were some of the best uses of on-screen musical performances. These moments were curated with great care and momentum, and it was a delight and joy to witness. While the film showcased many songs, from Jackson 5 to Michael’s solo work, many were missing. There was a lack of balance when incorporating more Jackson 5 songs compared to his solo career, which was oversaturated, given that the story would follow more of his solo music. 

 The lighting in these scenes, akin to others, was on point at all times, and there wasn’t a moment where it was poorly utilized, which was another win because the way that Michael used light as a gesture in his performances was an essential part of his stage presence. The cinematography could have been better. Overall, the film works, but in some performances it was a bit too perspective-heavy. There were moments when Jafar was mastering his late uncle’s signature moves in his dance sequences, and the camera work tried to overcompensate when there was no need. Jafar’s natural aura hit all the notes perfectly. 

An Admonishing Farewell

Michael is a biopic that the fans will enjoy for its detailed music numbers. Beyond that, the film is an oh-so-generic run-of-the-mill biopic that adds nothing new to the artist’s narrative or legacy. With poor writing and a lack of perspective in storytelling, the film does not live up to the artist’s legacy. Jafar Jackson gives an amazing performance as he portrays his late uncle with precision and nuance. Though flawed, with nothing new to say, Michael is best to watch when you go in with an open mind, looking to see some of the best choreographed musical moments of all time told through the lens of a motion picture. 

Watch Michael in theaters now!

Michael (2026) Official Lionsgate Trailer

Source: Dead Talk Live

Contact Information:

Email: news@deadtalknews.com

Phone: +1 (646) 397-2874

Dead Talk Live is simultaneously streamed to: YouTubeInstagramTikTokFacebookTwitchTwitterVimeo, and LinkedIn

Shop official Dead Talk Live Merchandise at our Online Store

Source: Dead Talk Live

Contact Information:

Email: news@deadtalknews.com

Phone: +1 (650) 308-4023

Dead Talk Live is simultaneously streamed to YouTubeInstagramFacebookTwitch, and Twitter daily at 9:30 PM Eastern U.S. Time.

Shop official Dead Talk Live Merchandise at our Online Store

Author

Posts

Elke Simmons' writing portfolio includes contributions to The Laredo Morning Times, Walt Disney World Eyes and Ears, Extinction Rebellion (XR) News/Blog, and Dead Talk News.